What shocks me the most is that this case is completely unambiguous. There is no question at all of what Andrea Clark wants. She wants to live. And if the doctor's at St. Luke's hadn't medicated her into a coma, she would be able to express this to them now as she did before they drugged her into a state of unconsciousness. How can they possibly argue that the right thing to do is to give up hope on a woman that wants to fight for her life?

Please contact St. Luke's and let them know (politely) what you think of this situation. I called them this morning and was transferred to their media relations department where I left them a message (they are apparently too pussy to pick up their phone), so don't be surprised if you are transferred to a voicemailbox as well.

One last thing...looking back on the Schiavo case, is it really so surprising that we ended up here? When you begin to devalue life...the lines get blurred. Sigh.