transcended.net >> red girl, blue city

Comments:

Those are not causes, but as you said "rights". They, like any other rights, should not be ignored. Commitment in this context refers to the adherence to the laws protecting these rights. You, being an Asian American woman, should probably be concerned as well.

Will

# posted by

Will : 11:40 AM

In the context that liberals discuss things like abortion, etc. they are what I would consider causes and NOT strict interpretation of the law as it was written. I think its disingenuous and a scare tactic that liberals use by invoking civil rights and workers right and claiming that people who are strict constructionist would abolish civil rights. I mean does Chuck Schumer honestly believe Justice Alito would force Rosa Parks to sit at the back of the bus again? HONESTLY? Cause if he does he needs to have his head checked.

# posted by

the wingless one : 2:19 PM

Also, judges are not supposed to be committed to only certain parts of the constitution, but the constitution in its entirety. It is wrong for these leading Democrats to pick and choose which parts they think justices should uphold. What about the 2nd ammendment? Why aren't they out there defending THAT right? Because they are intellectually dishonest.

# posted by

the wingless one : 2:21 PM




	"Being too charming was never one of my faults." - Kill Me Later Webcam Mine :: about me. wishlist Right-wingers :: RWN. Frank J. DF. Volokh. LGF. Flea. Serenity. Common Sense & Wonder. Neophyite Pundit. BlytheBlog. Red White and Right. RightGuys. The Politburo Diktat. Dave Munger. Chuck. Harry. Michelle Malkin. AHC. DW. Mlah. National Summary. Right Thinking Girl. Fausta. MaxedOutMama. My VRWC. La Shawn Barber. Moxie. Kali. Cassandra. Tony. Conservative Grapevine. The American Princess. Dr. Melissa Clouthier Military :: Kevin. Sgt Pontifex. Chief Wiggles. Eric. Koreahn. Bill Blogs :: Lian. Phil. Dan. Click. Jon. Rijah. Christine. Dave. Opinions Vary. Dave. Carey. Albert. Len. Grace. Thelma. Pia. Bumblebee Dreams. Todd. Babiegoose. Archives May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 Powered by Blogger.		Monday, October 31, 2005 in the know Not having a job after working full-time for the past year and a half is bizarre. What in the world did I used to do with all my free time? Did I really waste it all sitting on my behind? I feel so restless but I'm not sure what to do with myself. But at least I know about the nomination of Samuel Alito (I didn't hear about Harriet Miers withdrawing her nomination until the day after it happened ><). Why is it that whenever Democrats talk about a potential SC Justice they blabber on about whether or not they are "committed to civil rights, workers rights, etc." Pardon me if I'm wrong but aren't judges in general NOT supposed to be committed to causes, and instead be impartial, uninterested parties? wingless was still breathing at 12:51 PM - Comments: Those are not causes, but as you said "rights". They, like any other rights, should not be ignored. Commitment in this context refers to the adherence to the laws protecting these rights. You, being an Asian American woman, should probably be concerned as well. Will # posted by Will : 11:40 AM In the context that liberals discuss things like abortion, etc. they are what I would consider causes and NOT strict interpretation of the law as it was written. I think its disingenuous and a scare tactic that liberals use by invoking civil rights and workers right and claiming that people who are strict constructionist would abolish civil rights. I mean does Chuck Schumer honestly believe Justice Alito would force Rosa Parks to sit at the back of the bus again? HONESTLY? Cause if he does he needs to have his head checked. # posted by the wingless one : 2:19 PM Also, judges are not supposed to be committed to only certain parts of the constitution, but the constitution in its entirety. It is wrong for these leading Democrats to pick and choose which parts they think justices should uphold. What about the 2nd ammendment? Why aren't they out there defending THAT right? Because they are intellectually dishonest. # posted by the wingless one : 2:21 PM Post a Comment (c) 2001-2006 transcended.net - all rights reserved